Development of an interpretation guideline for the EORTC PRO measures

Principal investigator(s)
Monika Sztankay
Medical University of Innsbruck
Innsbruck, Austria
Project coordinator(s)
Daniela Krepper
Medical University of Innsbruck
Innsbruck, Austria

Project summary

The assessment of PRO data in oncological practice and research has proved to be beneficial for patient outcomes. By offering guidance on interpretation, the EORTC QLG aims to support the use of PRO data assessed with its measures. To meet the need for practical guidelines on how to differentiate and use the various ways of interpreting EORTC PRO data, we aim to develop a guideline including best practice recommendations on interpreting PROs assessed with EORTC PRO measures for scientific as well as clinical use. The recommendations in the guideline will be based on existing evidence and consensus between PRO experts in the field, including buy-in from relevant stakeholders (i.e. patient representatives, clinicians, researchers, pharma representatives). Guideline development will follow the procedure established by the National Institute of Care and Health Excellence and the GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist.

Achievements

  • Theoretical Background section of the guideline available
  • All draft recommendations available
  • Guideline glossary available
  • First draft of the patient version available
  • Survey for consensus process about to be disseminated

 

Future plans

• Consensus process will start by the end of Q3, 2025
• Draft guideline will be available for consultation by the end of Q4, 2025

Interested in the project or want to tell us your opinion on EORTC PRO data interpretation?

You are invited to contact the PI (monika.sztankay@i-med.ac.at) for more information on the project and possibilities for future collaboration.

We are looking forward to hearing from you!

For patients

Up to date, the EORTC Quality of Life Group offers guidance on how to develop its PRO questionnaires, how to translate and how to migrate them into electronic platforms for assessing PROs in clinical trials and in clinical practice.

What is currently missing is a guideline for the interpretation of PRO data, assessed with EORTC PRO questionnaires. The emerging guideline aims to support researchers, as well as patients and clinicians, in interpreting PRO scores correctly and evaluate the results’ clinical relevance. The final guideline will include the expertise of estimated colleagues in the field as well as from researchers, clinicians, and patients working in and with the EORTC Quality of Life Group.

Go to Top